Skip to main content

Tool Enables IBM i Administrators to Assess Security Weaknesses

The security compliance, assessment and reporting tool (CART) allows time-starved IBM i administrators to examine where hackers could exploit their systems.

Computer monitor with security shield.

Even with more public awareness about security breaches in recent years, it’s surprising that “security administration isn’t given the priority it should,” says Terry Ford, team lead for security services delivery, IBM Systems Lab Services in Rochester, Minn. “Administrators don’t regularly look at it, or they only look at it after performing other work.”

Still, Ford believes that they’re not intentionally negligent. Administrators are often frustrated because they’d like to do more security checks, but budgetary constraints stop them, he explains. “Yet they will be the ones who are held accountable if they aren’t able to practice secure computing with the rigor it requires.”

Why don’t organizations examine security as closely as they should? “Time is a big part of that,” Ford says. Companies focus on producing and selling products or services, so security is often an afterthought, he notes.

To help IBM i clients, Ford and his team built a security compliance, assessment and reporting tool (CART) that allows time-starved administrators to examine where hackers could exploit their systems. (Other IBM teams have created similar assessment tools for AIX* and Linux* administrators.) The CART provides a comprehensive picture of a client’s systems and pinpoints current and potential weaknesses. The tool creates daily reports but also features an alert function when changes occur for system administrators who can’t review every report.

The Bigger Picture

The lack of time focused on security is just one problem. In Ford’s opinion, many organizations are “often ignorant, or choose to be ignorant, about the dangers of a security breach.” They think a breach won’t hit them because their business is too small. With news about major retailers, internet service providers and financial services firms that suffered expensive data breaches, they believe that hackers prefer to target larger organizations. There’s some truth to that, Ford notes. “But what the smaller guy fails to realize is that a hacker’s path to the larger organization may be through him, a smaller but related company or supplier,” he adds.

“What the smaller guy fails to realize is that a hacker’s path to the larger organization may be through him, a smaller but related company or supplier.”
—Terry Ford, team lead for security services delivery, IBM Systems Lab Services

Organizations try to keep their systems secure by having at least a firewall or password access system. But Ford notes, “Hackers are more educated than system administrators are.” He explains that hackers have made it their job to outwit the latest cybersecurity fixes and strategies. And few companies can devote the same kind of full-time resources to system security.

Several vendors offer IBM i security solutions. They have very good monitoring and remedial products, Ford says. “However, they tend to be high-level and do not go deep enough,” he adds. “Because of this, clients are sometimes given a false sense of security when they may have unknown configuration items such as with DDM or SSH, leaving their system at risk.”

Monitoring tools can help. But if an assessment hasn’t identified a weak point, “it means the weakness is still present,” Ford notes. “A comprehensive assessment solution with monitoring can help clients determine the extent of their weaknesses and provide information for a proper root cause analysis in remediating the weakness.”

Not-So Secret Passwords

Another problem security administrators face is when user profiles and passwords are weak points. Even though they’re designed to block hackers, Ford believes too many users have passwords that can hand cyber thieves the key to their employer’s data. “The easiest hack for many cyber pirates is using default passwords or dictionary passwords,” he notes. The default password is the easiest as it’s usually the same as the user name. Dictionary passwords include movie titles, names of sports teams, family names and other popular cultural references. Users also often use the same passwords for all the systems they access. Once access is gained to one system, all connected systems are at risk.

The IBM i CART hunts down these easy passwords and their variations. “We have created a tool that actually does a dictionary check of its users’ passwords,” Ford says. “Using 10,000 well-known passwords discovered in reported breaches, we can calculate and compare whether a user or administrator’s password is on that list.” With that knowledge, security administrators can encourage users to create more complex passwords or disable their account until a more complex password is entered.

“Using 10,000 well-known passwords discovered in reported breaches, we can calculate and compare whether a user or administrator’s password is on that list.”
—Terry Ford

Identifying unsecure user names and passwords is a small part of the CART’s function. “We report on more than 1,000 data points related to security settings, configuration and statistics of system use,” Ford says. “With this, a client can observe changes over time or perform various types of trend analysis related to security. There are probably millions of other pieces of information that we’re scanning through and interrogating to see how it’s accessed and who owns it. We don’t look at the content of any file. We simply check to make sure a backdoor isn’t present in any of those objects.”

An event-monitoring component is also included with the CART. This gives clients a more granular look at security events across all of their enterprise’s IBM i systems in real time. “It can then alert those who need to know of their occurrence or report on them from the central data mart,” Ford says. “We also provide a utility for customers to add or create items or events of their interest.”

The Gift of Time

Over the past four years, the CART has become a flagship item in Lab Services’ portfolio, and it’s based on IBM’s security assessment tool, which has had more than two decades of development. But it’s always evolving. Lab Services continually aims to provide better systems and security management because Ford notes cybercriminals are constant threats.

“We try to automate as much of our assessment process as possible—what we can reliably and comprehensively do in the shortest amount of time,” he adds. “We have derivatives of our tool that create an even more comprehensive view of security. That’s work we continue to enhance and develop.”

Ford’s team at Lab Services constantly seeks ways to update the CART tool to provide value to the IBM i community. If system administrators can only devote one day a week to security, Lab Services can still provide them with “a picture of what changed in their environment so that when they do get the time to look at security, they can hone in on the things that have changed,” Ford says. “Or, with our event monitor, the client can respond immediately to events.”

In the future, “We’ll add more metrics, more configuration items and security analytics,” he says. “When we designed and developed the tooling, it was a collaboration with many subject matter experts—first and foremost, the DB2* for i consultants here in Lab Services. This team helps clients get more value out of data through analytics. And that was at the heart of what we wanted to provide relative to security.”

Save Time, Save Money

Ford describes the CART as a kind of time machine, as it captures what has been going on in a client’s systems and makes predictions on how it could look in the future based on the current operating mode.

Most clients who need to assess and monitor their systems are very time-conscious, according to Ford. Unfortunately, they can’t afford to spend the time to analyze everything on the system. Yet they need to be aware of what’s going on within their systems. With CART, he notes, “we have created a tool that helps them buy the time they need to find what is going on.”

Sponsored Advertising Content - Mandatory Security Reporting Intensifies for All Merchants

One million: a huge number. When asked how many credit card transactions are processed each year, most answer: “Less than 1 million.” Until Jan. 31, that excused you from mandatory security audit reporting to your bank.

However, now even the lowest volume merchants must submit a PCI Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ), and an Attestation of Compliance (AOC) signed by an officer of your company stating its accuracy. If you touch card data with your workstations—ever—that SAQ will be the draconian SAQ “D”—19,000-plus words asking over 500 intrusive, technical and operational questions, possibly requiring months to research.

The payment industry is moving toward more ponderous reporting from you. Be alert and diligent. The bank notices are on their way. This will intensify.

After 24 years in this niche, we see an unprecedented level of anxiety and activity at the card brands. The rules for securely handling credit cards are changing rapidly, and the simplicity of the past is being challenged. Integration with remote tokenization is part of the answer.

Ira Chandler

CTO, Curbstone Corporation

Author of the first commercial AS/400 credit card software in 1993, Ira and Curbstone focus on IBM i payment security.


Stay on top of all things tech!
View upcoming & on-demand webinars →